Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mink Coat Killa LP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:57, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

The Mink Coat Killa LP

The Mink Coat Killa LP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced album article with no indication of notability, brief google search indicates trivial coverage. Jax 0677 (talk) 17:21, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:33, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

• Keep. I've added some significant and reliable sources that are independent of the topic (i.e. The News & Observer[1], HipHopDX[2], HotNewHipHop[3]). — Zawl 17:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

• Reply - As of 15:05 UTC on September 12, 2017, this article still does not go far beyond a track listing. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:06, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

• Content such as the track listing and infobox are unsuitable to be merged into the artist article, if that's what you're implying the outcome should be. I see no issue with keeping the article since it's a new album, only released few months ago and there are already enough significant coverage for WP:GNG to be met. — Zawl 15:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

• Reply - Per WP:NALBUM, "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article". --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:05, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947^{(c) (m)} 03:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:01, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.